<?xml version="1.0"?>

<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Needlessly abject</title>
    <link>http://peeved.org/blog/internet/</link>
    <description>I am not a teenager. I play one on the Internet.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Public Domain - All rights under copyright waived.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:15:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Server Fault update</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20090609-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
I'm on page 1 of the user list now having been a member of the site for 7
days.<a href="http://serverfault.com/users/4392/matt-simmons">Matt Simmons</a>,
who has been a member for 12 days, is also on the front page, as is <a href="http://serverfault.com/users/3038/sysadmin1138">Sysadmin1138</a>,
who has been a member for 21 days. Other than those two, everyone else on
the front page has been a member for more than 21 days (3 times my current
membership tenure).
</p>

<p>
I'd still love a "Server Fault Leader board" that should show motion amongst
the rankings (like the old distributed.net scores!), but I'm not going to go
scraping their site just to do that myself.
</p>

<p>
I'm really enjoying the site. Eventually, I'll get around to asking a
question or two. For now, though, I'll continue answering questions and
having a good time.
</p>]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/internet</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20090609-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Serverfault.com</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20090603-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
This is a horrible thing for me to get started doing.  *sigh*  Still, with 3
days membership I'm up to 892 reputation. I don't see anybody else who is as
high with as few days membership. I'd love to know how my rate of ascent
compares to other users.
</p>

<p>
I'll be cracking page 2 of the user list tomorrow.
</p>]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/internet</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20090603-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>White House "RSS" Feeds -- Problems</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20090124-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
I learned that I'm <a href="http://workbench.cadenhead.org/news/3479/obamas-white-house-adopts-atom-format">not the only one having problems</a>
with the White House "RSS" (really Atom) feeds. My feed reader (a very, very
hacked up version of <a href="http://tt-rss.org/">TT-RSS</a>)
populated the database with a single entry from the White House
<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/feed/blog.aspx">blog feed</a>,
but never loaded any more articles, though examining the
feed "by hand" shows that there are new entries.
</p>

<p>
After doing some digging around, I found that the same things that <a href="http://workbench.cadenhead.org">Rogers Cadenhead</a>
found (before I found his blog entry, of course). The "id" attribute of each
entry, used in the TT-RSS schema as the primary key for the row in the
"entries" table. Lovely.
</p>

<p>
I know there are a lot more pressing problems for the U.S. Federal Executive
than fixing their "RSS" feeds, but surely it's somebody's job to work on
this. Please fix your feeds.
</p>]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/internet</category>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20090124-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Terry Childs / San Francisco FiberWAN Situation</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20080719-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
A friend of mine just sent me a link to an <a
href="http://www.infoworld.com/archives/emailPrint.jsp?R=printThis&A=/article/08/07/18/30FE-sf-network-lockout_1.html">InfoWorld piece about Terry Childs</a>
and the situation surrounding his arrest in San Francisco. The email
referenced in the article sounds very credible to me. It sounds to me like a
classic game of politics, taken to an extreme. Terry probably got into an
argument with a vindictive supervisor, probably used words that were too
heated, and ended up in a bad place.
</p>

<p>
If the details about Terry's controlling streak are true (not wanting to
save configurations on remote routers into flash, disabling password
recovery), I have to take some "respect points" away from Terry for making
what I'd consider questionable design decisions, but the picture the email
in the article paints is of a competent and efficient network engineer.
</p>
]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/internet</category>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20080719-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The "Long Tail" of poop.</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20080502-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
For reasons that I cannot identify, I decided to chart the number of results
returned by <a href="http://www.google.com">Gooogle</a> for various
spellings of the word "poop".
</p>

<div class="entryquote"><blockquote><p align="center">
 <a target="_newframe" href="http://peeved.org/pics/internet/20080502-001.png"><img border="0" alt=""width="364" height="209" src="http://peeved.org/pics/internet/20080502-001.tn.png"></a>
</p></div>

<p>
I also made a view into the "long tail" of "poop" (showing the odd spike at
44 O's.)
</p>

<div class="entryquote"><blockquote><p align="center">
 <a target="_newframe" href="http://peeved.org/pics/internet/20080502-002.png"><img border="0" alt="" width="364" height="209" src="http://peeved.org/pics/internet/20080502-002.tn.png"></a>
</p></div>

<p>
I have absolutely no explanation for doing this.
</p>

<p>
Pooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooop.
</p>

<p>
If you'd like, I've also made the <a href="http://peeved.org/misc/20080502-001.txt">raw data</a> available for
remixing.
</p>]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/internet</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20080502-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Shift Space - Another Third Voice?</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20071203-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p>
I just saw a <a
href="http://www.hackszine.com/blog/archive/2007/12/annotate_the_web_with_shiftspa.html?CMP=OTC-7G2N43923558">post on MAKE magazine's Hackszine blog</a>
about <a href="http://www.shiftspace.org/">ShiftSpace</a>. My initial reaction
was "Oh, it's a new <a href="http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue4_10/margolis/">Third Voice</a>..." followed quickly by the musing, "I wonder when they'll be <a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2001/04/42803">hounded into nonexistence</a>."
</p>

<p>
I'm still pissed about how Third Voice was <a href="http://www.avantart.com/personal/nototv/saynototv.html">received</a>.
In today's even more volatile copyright climate, I can't imagine that ShiftSpace will fare any better.
</p>
]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/internet</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20071203-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Fixing Error 0x80070052 When Copying Photos to a Memory Card</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20071202-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
I'm getting at least tens of hits per day coming from searches for keywords
like <em>error</em>, <em>0x80070052</em>, and <em>memory card</em>. It turns
out that after writing my <a href="http://peeved.org/blog/2007/10/02#20071001-001">snarky little post</a>
relating to <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/comments/2087460.aspx">Mark Russinovich's blog post about problems copying files to USB flash drives</a>,
I posted with the words "memory card" in the body of the post, and now I'm a
keyword magnet. Some people might be game to spin up a <a href="http://www.google.com/adsense">Google AdSense</a>
subscription, but I'll just say:
</p>

<p><strong>If you're getting an "Error 0x80070052" copying files to a memory
card / flash drive, it's because you're putting too many files (possibly
with very long names) in the root directory of the memory card. Make a
folder on the memory card / flash drive and copy the files into the folder.
They'll copy fine.</strong></p>]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/internet</category>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20071202-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Tickets.com Personal Data Leak?</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20070513-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
<p>
I make one-off email addresses for nearly every online vendor I deal with.
Usually, the addresses are in the form of <em>domainname@peeved.org</em>, as
is a common practice with people who own domains.
</p>

<p>
My one-off address for <a rel="tag" href="http://tickets.com">tickets.com</a>
started receiving spam on 5/11, from the <a rel="tag" href="http://uusocietyofcleveland.tripod.com">Unitarian Universalist Society of Cleveland</a>
by way of a spamming service at <a rel="tag" href="http://www.constantcontact.com">Constant Contact</a>.
</p>

<p>
Sure, sure, I could "unsubscribe". Since I'm not going to do any more
business with Tickets.com, I'm just going to blackhole the email address
anyway, but it does make me wonder how these Constant Contact or UUSC people
got the address to start with.
</p>

<p>
Here are the two messages I received: <a href="http://peeved.org/misc/uusc1.txt">Message 1</a>
and <a href="http://peeved.org/misc/uusc2.txt">Message 2</a>.
</p>
]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/internet</category>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 22:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20070513-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Googe?</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20070214-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
Gooooooogle's title image today seems a little "off". I read it as "Googe".
I've always subscribed to the graphic design philosophy that something which
looks accidental, even if it's not, will be seen as accidental.
</p>

<div class="entryquote"><p align="center"><img src="http://peeved.org/pics/internet/20070214-001.png" height="121" width="288" alt="Googe"></p></div>

<p>
"Googe" makes me feel vaguely offended and dirty. The bits of "chocolate" on
the second "o" don't help that feeling. "Aww, man-- your dog just googed all
over the futon!"
</p>]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/internet</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20070214-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Go Bunnie, Go!</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20070201-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
I read Bunnie Huang's blog because I long to be a hardware geek, but never
actually do anything about it. Having said that, I couldn't help but comment
about his <a href="http://www.bunniestudios.com/wordpress/?p=151">Name that Ware</a>
posting for January, 2007, if only because he seems to feel much the same way I
do about the recent trend of <a href="http://vigilant.tv/article/3061/7-arrested-over-all-your-base-posters">idiotic</a>
<a href="http://minneapolis.metblogs.com/archives/2006/07/zombie_terroris.phtml">mass hysteria</a>
by the American public.
</p>

<div class="entryquote"><blockquote>I believe that fundamentally, the most
effective way to deal with terror is to not be afraid of it. I say take it
with a stiff upper lip, ignore it, and live life like you used to, as a free
society with great liberties and tolerance for all walks of life. Travel.
Express. Build. Innovate. Research. Be an Individual. Be smart about who you
trust, but still be willing to trust.</blockquote></div>

<p>
I agree with everything Bunnie says here, but I think that it's unlikely to
happen, because living in fear is seductive, and because it drives a
feedback loop that only amplifies itself. Don't misunderstand-- I'm not a
conspiracy theorist who believes that this whole "War on Terror" is a big
plot. I believe that what we're seeing is the manifest result of a
confluence of the "best" interests of different social groups being advanced.
</p>

<p>
Terrorists want to inflict terror. That's what terrorists do. It's in the
best interests of terrorists to have the American citizenry in mortal fear.
The more terrified that the citizenry is, the easier it is for terrorists to
inflict more terror. At this point, terrorists can inflict mass panic by
doing nothing, while marketing companies put out lighted signs. This is, no
doubt, cause for much celebration in terrorist circles, if only for the cost
savings in materials and labor.
</p>

<p>
Most Americans (citizens and politicians) have lost touch with the fact that
the government is sanctioned "by the people, for the people", and look at
"The Government" as being a featureless black-box over which they can exert
no influence. The American political machine has discovered how to exploit
the two party system to create elections that pit candidates with no major
differences against each other, and to spin everything such that the
candidates have a <em>superficial</em> appearance of difference. The
American political institution, as it exists now, wants only to perpetuate
itself. Constituents are only too happy to oblige, so long as their districts
continue to receive the gravy-train of tax dollars. The "War on Terror" has
been a wonderful gravy train for <a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/wm1038.cfm">pork barrel</a>
<a href="http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.24249,filter.all/pub_detail.asp">spending</a>.
To this end, the best interests of the political establishment lie in
pumping as many tax dollars through the government as possible to keep
average citizens happy, and to reinforce the public perception that the
operation of government isn't something citizens have any material control
over. The "War on Terror" is a great tool for politicians.
</p>

<p>
The average American citizen has little in the way of motivation or long
term goals. I get the feeling that most of my fellow citizens are working
hard and striving to make it to the next evening "reality" television show
broadcast, the next major sporting event, or the next weekend. (Perhaps a
few have a longer-term goal to buy another new SUV, obtain another home equity
loan and sink deeper into debt, or get locked into another multi-year
wireless telephone contract w/ a shiny new phone and some nice MP3 ring tones.)
</p>

<p>
We are an aimless, sedentary society. Human nature is to be lazy, fat, and
"happy"-- to expend the least possible energy for the greatest reward. Life,
in general, works this way-- sinking into a local minimum in a vast fitness
landscape. It's also human nature to want some else to take care of life's
details for you. I do think that people can rise above human nature, but
they have to have their attention drawn to their human failings. 
Living in mortal fear, and asking "The Government" to take
care of you is great, because it makes a convenient excuse for such a 
slovenly, <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/bush-calls-larger-military-urges/story.aspx?guid=%7BD8B72264-6186-461A-B8B0-1727AE66EC71%7D">fiscally irresponsible lifestyle</a>.
For those who profit from this mortal fear, pointing out the awful humanity
of fat slob Americans is the last thing they'd want to do.
</p>

<p>
As far as I can see, it's a win / win scenario for all the parties involved!
The terrorists get to inflict terror, the political machine gets to
perpetuate itself and remain in power, and the average American citizen gets
to fulfill their basic human desires to be complacent and "taken care of"--
sinking deeper and deeper into a warm, soft cocoon of materialism and debt
while trying to seek comfort from the mortal fear they live in. Is it
sustainable over the long term? Does it really matter?
</p>

<p>
I'm not scared of the terrorists, I'd like my freedom of speech and assembly
back, and I'm damned tired of playing "security theatre". Being a late
20's / early 30's self-employed, unmarried, childless, fiscally conservative
citizen who pays for his own health insurance, doesn't drive an SUV, owns a
house, and doesn't have any credit card debt makes me feel like a hugely
underrepresented demographic, both in government, and in American society in
general. Worse, I know that I'll be paying for fellow citizens' lifestyle
choices in the next few years-- right before China comes in and buys this
whole thing out from under us.
</p>

<p>
Hopefully somebody comes out of this whole thing ahead. I don't know how to
fix it, and I don't even think I care anymore. For my part, I feel fairly
certain that the reward for my labor won't be what I'd like (an independent
lifestyle, free from the interference of others, to live and work as I see
fit), but rather will be a life of working to subsidize everyone else when
we eventually have to "pull together" and try to bail the country out.
</p>]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/internet</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 12:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/internet/20070201-001.html</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>
