<?xml version="1.0"?>

<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Needlessly abject</title>
    <link>http://peeved.org/blog/politics/</link>
    <description>I am not a teenager. I play one on the Internet.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Public Domain - All rights under copyright waived.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:06:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>I'm an American, too!</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/politics/20090120-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<div class="entryquote"><blockquote><p>"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus--  and non-believers."</blockquote></p></div>

<p><em>This</em> non-believer couldn't be happier about the overt statement
that President Obama made today acknowledging that I am not a second-class
citizen. It might sound trite, but there was more "change" in that simple
acknowledgment than I thought would happen in the entire Obama presidency.
This affirmation that the non-religious are as much citizens as the
religious gives me positive feelings that I don't believe I've ever had
before, with respect to my government.</p>

<p>
The last eight years have actively increased my fear that, eventually, my
"kind" would end up being the victims of some kind of tangible, physical
oppression-- so much so that the idea of even mentioning my lack of
religious beliefs in this blog was something that actively frightened me.
This statement in Mr. Obama's address today, simple though it was, goes a
long way toward easing the discomfort and suspicion that that the last eight
years have imparted.
</p>]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/politics</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/politics/20090120-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Anti-FISA Bill Flyer</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/politics/20080702-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
It's a bit tacky for me to do this, but this post is just going to be an
email that I blind carbon-copied out to a group of friends and acquaintences
a moment ago. I think this is important, so I'm stooping to this level.
</p>

<div class="entryquote"><blockquote>
I'm sorry for the unsolicited email. It takes me getting pretty riled up to
send an unsolicited email like this, so I hope you'll forgive me.
</p>

<p>
Next week, the U.S. Senate is likely to pass a bill that will strip
Americans of their 4th Amendment rights with respect to having their
international telephone calls tapped without probable cause or the issuance
of a warrant. For those of us who would like to see this bill stopped, we
need to act quickly and get the word out to the public.
</p>

<p>
I've put together a flyer that I'm going to hand out at a parade I'm
attending Friday and a festival on Saturday. The flyer is available at
<a href="http://peeved.org/misc/Warrantless_Wiretap_Flyer.pdf">http://peeved.org/misc/Warrantless_Wiretap_Flyer.pdf</a>,
and I'd encourage you to have a look. I've been over the text of my flyer
again and again, and I think it free of basic grammar and spelling mistakes
(though it's not necessarily very pretty). If you have suggestions or
criticisms, I'd love to hear them. I've tried to make something that eschews
partisan rhetoric and buzzwords and cuts to the heart of the matter-- the
fact that the rights of law-abiding Americans will be taken away by the
passage of this bill. It might be worded a bit sensationally, but I think
that getting the public fired up about this issue is important.
</p>

<p>
If you feel up to it, print some off and hand them out while you're out this
Independence Day weekend. If you don't, please visit the web site on the
flyer (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6jxnsx">http://tinyurl.com/6jxnsx</a>),
look up the telephone numbers of your U.S. Senators, and give them a call to
let them know how you feel about this legislation. Even if you don't think
of yourself as "political", please take the few minutes necessary to make
this call-- it's important!
</p>

<p>
The United States is a county based on the rule of law. The law was broken,
and those who broke the law need to be held accountable. This isn't a
partisan issue or an issue of security-- this is an issue of the rule of law
and the basic rights granted to us as Americans by the Constitution. I've
heard argument for this bill articulated in a way that questions the
commitment of the bill's opponents to the "war on terror" or to the safety
of Americans. Those are fallacious arguments, and ignore the real issue
behind the opposition to this bill-- the fact that it runs slipshod over the
Constitution.
</p>

<p>
I *would* argue that opposition to this bill is an issue of patriotism. A
true patriot would take a stand for the Constitution and a stand against
unlawful infringements on Americans' rights. Our founding fathers could not
have envisioned electronic surveillance, but I'm confident that their vision
for the protection of Americans against unreasonable search and seizure
would include such electronic surveillance as this bill addresses.
</p>

<p>
Thank you for your time, and my apologies if this unsolicited email was
unwelcome. If you stand with me on this issue, please help in any way you
can-- even forwarding this email around (distasteful as mass-forwarding of
emails is) would be appreciated. We've got to get the word out before it's
too late.
</blockquote</div>

<p>
Like I said-- I think this is important, and I hope you do too.
</p>]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/politics</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/politics/20080702-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Xeni's 'Surrealist' Airport Moment</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/politics/20070830-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
Xeni Jardin of <a rel="tag" href="www.boingboing.net">BoingBoing</a>
reported a <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/08/29/moment-of-tsa-surrea.html">strange "freeze tag" event</a>
that she participated in when arriving back at LAX yesterday. Quoth Xeni:
</p>

<div class="entryquote">I walked from the arrival gate ... all of a sudden
about a dozen or more TSA personnel ... appeared, shouting STOP WHERE YOU
ARE. FREEZE. Not just at me, but all of the travelers ... After 30 minutes,
the TSA people said, okay, you may leave now. And everyone unfroze, and went
and got their bags. No explanation.</div>

<p>
Scary shit. We Americans are <em>so fucked</em>. <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/08/29/moment-of-tsa-surrea.html#comment-2058">This post</a>
sums up my feelings pretty effectively.
</p>

<p>
I'm dreading flying in October. Absolutely dreading it.
</p>]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/politics</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/politics/20070830-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Ohio Data Theft-- Matthew Curtin is on the Case!</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/politics/20070618-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
Per an AP story I saw on <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070618/ap_on_hi_te/data_theft">Yahoo</a>,
the State of Ohio has hired Matthew Curtin of <a href="http://www.interhack.com">Interhack</a>
to assess the likelihood of a third-party accessing the data that was
stolen.
</p>

<p>
I don't know Matt personally, but I've heard him speak a couple of times,
and it gives me comfort to know that he's working on this. Matt clearly
knows what he's doing, and I have the highest respect for him. I'm waiting
anxiously to hear what comes of this...
</p>]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/politics</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/politics/20070618-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Ohio Data Theft - Somethings Fishy...</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/politics/20070617-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
A friend of mine who worked for the State of Ohio, in information technology
at the Department of Administrative Services, says that something is fishy
with this recent data theft. He describes elaborate physical security, and
management policies that would have made this kind of breach unlikely. He
talked about the Ohio State Highway Patrol being used to ferry backup
cartridges between facilities, and felt that it was highly unlikely that a
policy that sent this data home with an intern (or any other employee) could
exist.
</p>

<p>
My friend's supposition is that some is being "set up" for this. It seems
sort of conspiracy-minded, but, then I suppose politics are a bit
cut-throat. On the other side of the coin, though, I know how easy it is for
large organizations to make really mind-numbingly stupid blunders like this.
My friend's words are cause for some additional consideration, so I'm going
to keep an eye on this thing. It'll be interesting to learn what the
"device" was that was actually stolen (It was valued at $15.00, per the
police report).
</p>]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/politics</category>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 00:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/politics/20070617-001.html</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Post-election blues...</title>
      <link>http://peeved.org/blog/politics/20061108-001.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
I drove to my first Customer site this morning pondering the <a href="http://www.sos.state.oh.us/SOS/ElectionsVoter/results2006.aspx?Section=1855" rel="tag">minimum wage increase</a>
that my fellow Ohioans voted in yesterday. I wonder which of my Customers
will be the first to let me know that they'll be cutting back on staff, or
cutting back on IT operations due to increased expense. In my personal life,
I expect that my cost of living is going to go up. I keep fairly good
records of my personal spending, and it'll be interesting to see how it
looks after the wage increase goes into effect.
</p>

<p>
I want to say things about my philosophy of the employer/employee
relationship, but I just can't muster the energy. My fellow Ohioians have
spoken, and to me, they're saying "we want business to move to other
states".
</p>]]></description>
      <author>T.A. Adjuster &lt;blog@peeved.org&gt;</author>
      <category>/politics</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://peeved.org/blog/politics/20061108-001.html</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

